Conditional Correlation Models

multivariate-garchconditional-correlationcccdccgarchvolatilitycovariance-matrixstructural-breaksempirical-finance

Definition

Conditional correlation models decompose the conditional covariance matrix HtH_t of a multivariate return vector yty_t as Ht=DtRtDt,H_t = D_t R_t D_t, where Dt=diag(σ1t,,σNt)D_t = \mathrm{diag}(\sigma_{1t},\ldots,\sigma_{Nt}) contains individual conditional standard deviations from univariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models and RtR_t is the N×NN\times N conditional correlation matrix. The key virtue of this decomposition is parsimony: the NN univariate volatility models and the correlation dynamics are estimated separately, reducing the curse of dimensionality relative to full vech-GARCH (VEC) or Baba-Engle-Kraft-Kroner (BEKK) models.

Key Ideas

How It Works

Two-Step DCC Estimation

DCC-E is estimated by decomposing the log-likelihood LT=QL1+QL2L_T = QL_1 + QL_2:

QL1=i=1Ni(θi),QL2=12t=1T[logRt+utRt1ut].QL_1 = \sum_{i=1}^N \ell_i(\theta_i), \qquad QL_2 = -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{t=1}^T \bigl[\log|R_t| + u_t' R_t^{-1} u_t\bigr].

Step 1 maximizes QL1QL_1 — the sum of NN independent univariate GARCH log-likelihoods — yielding D^t\hat{D}_t and u^t\hat{u}_t. Step 2 maximizes QL2QL_2 over (α,β)(\alpha,\beta) given u^t\hat{u}_t. The estimator is consistent but not fully efficient; a single Newton-Raphson step at the two-step estimates achieves asymptotic efficiency.

Variance targeting replaces the free parameter Qˉ\bar{Q} by its sample analogue T1tu^tu^tT^{-1}\sum_t \hat{u}_t \hat{u}_t', further reducing the parameter count.

Invariance and Aggregation

General VEC and BEKK are invariant to linear transformations of εt\varepsilon_t; diagonal VEC, diagonal BEKK, CCC, and DCC are not invariant. A bivariate VEC(1,1) implies each marginal is at most weak GARCH(3,3); DCC marginalization properties are unknown. Weak multivariate GARCH (MGARCH) is closed under temporal aggregation (Hafner 2003).

Quasi-Maximum Likelihood (QML) Theory

The Gaussian quasi-log-likelihood LT(θ)=12t=1TlogHt(θ)12t=1T(ytμt)Ht(θ)1(ytμt)L_T(\theta) = -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{t=1}^T \log|H_t(\theta)| - \frac{1}{2}\sum_{t=1}^T (y_t - \mu_t)' H_t(\theta)^{-1}(y_t - \mu_t) yields consistent estimates if the first two conditional moments are correctly specified (Jeantheau 1998). Asymptotic normality has been established only for BEKK (Comte-Lieberman 2003); the asymptotic theory for CCC/DCC relies on more informal arguments. Robust sandwich standard errors handle non-normality.

CCC-MGARCH Application: Korean Currency Crisis (Kim-Tsurumi 2000)

Kim and Tsurumi (2000) apply CCC-MGARCH to four daily Korean financial returns (Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) spot/futures and Won/Dollar spot/non-deliverable forward (NDF)) over October 1996 – April 1998. Marginal GARCH(1,1) estimates are integrated GARCH (IGARCH, α^i+β^i1\hat\alpha_i + \hat\beta_i \approx 1) for all four series. Full-sample estimate: ρ^KF,KS=0.8597\hat\rho_{KF,KS} = 0.8597; pooled log-likelihood = −2100.77.

An unknown structural break date tt^* is estimated via Laplace-approximation Bayesian posterior: the log-posterior is proportional to split-sample log-likelihoods minus half the log-determinant of associated Hessians. Grid search over 5 July – 10 December 1997 yields a multivariate break mode at 20 October 1997, before the 8 November official Won devaluation. Derivative markets (futures: 11 August; NDF: 14 August 1997) broke earlier than spot markets (spot: 30 September; WS [Won/Dollar spot]: 22 October 1997), consistent with informed trading anticipating the crisis. See Kim-Tsurumi (2000).

Why It Matters

Open Questions

Related