Definition
Conditional correlation models decompose the conditional covariance matrix Ht of a multivariate return vector yt as
Ht=DtRtDt,
where Dt=diag(σ1t,…,σNt) contains individual conditional standard deviations from univariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models and Rt is the N×N conditional correlation matrix. The key virtue of this decomposition is parsimony: the N univariate volatility models and the correlation dynamics are estimated separately, reducing the curse of dimensionality relative to full vech-GARCH (VEC) or Baba-Engle-Kraft-Kroner (BEKK) models.
Key Ideas
- Positive definiteness is guaranteed by construction: Ht=DtRtDt is positive definite (PD) whenever Rt is a valid correlation matrix (Rt≻0, unit diagonal).
- Constant Conditional Correlation (CCC, Bollerslev 1990): Rt=R for all t. Simple and consistent to estimate, but empirically rejected in most financial data. [N(N+5)]/2 parameters total. NOT invariant to linear transformations of εt.
- Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC-E, Engle 2002): Rt is time-varying via the auxiliary process
Qt=(1−α−β)Qˉ+αut−1ut−1′+βQt−1,Rt=(diagQt)−1/2Qt(diagQt)−1/2,
where ut=Dt−1εt are standardized residuals and Qˉ=E[utut′]. Scalar (α,β): [(N+1)(N+4)]/2 parameters total. Mean-reverting when α+β<1.
- DCC-T (Tse-Tsui 2002): Rt=(1−θ1−θ2)R+θ1Ψt−1+θ2Rt−1, where Ψt−1 is the M-period rolling sample correlation of ut; requires M≥N.
- Generalized Dynamic Covariance (GDC, Kroner-Ng 1998): Ht=DtRtDt+Φ⊙Θt, nesting DCC, CCC, diagonal VEC, BEKK, and factor GARCH. The Asymmetric Dynamic Covariance (ADC) variant adds leverage via bi′vt−1vt−1′bj where vt=max(0,−εt).
- Copula-GARCH: By Sklar's (1959) theorem, the joint distribution factors as marginals plus copula. Fit N univariate GARCH models, then estimate copula parameters on standardized residuals. Allows non-Gaussian joint distributions (Student-t, Clayton, Gumbel) while retaining flexible marginals.
How It Works
Two-Step DCC Estimation
DCC-E is estimated by decomposing the log-likelihood LT=QL1+QL2:
QL1=i=1∑Nℓi(θi),QL2=−21t=1∑T[log∣Rt∣+ut′Rt−1ut].
Step 1 maximizes QL1 — the sum of N independent univariate GARCH log-likelihoods — yielding D^t and u^t. Step 2 maximizes QL2 over (α,β) given u^t. The estimator is consistent but not fully efficient; a single Newton-Raphson step at the two-step estimates achieves asymptotic efficiency.
Variance targeting replaces the free parameter Qˉ by its sample analogue T−1∑tu^tu^t′, further reducing the parameter count.
Invariance and Aggregation
General VEC and BEKK are invariant to linear transformations of εt; diagonal VEC, diagonal BEKK, CCC, and DCC are not invariant. A bivariate VEC(1,1) implies each marginal is at most weak GARCH(3,3); DCC marginalization properties are unknown. Weak multivariate GARCH (MGARCH) is closed under temporal aggregation (Hafner 2003).
Quasi-Maximum Likelihood (QML) Theory
The Gaussian quasi-log-likelihood
LT(θ)=−21t=1∑Tlog∣Ht(θ)∣−21t=1∑T(yt−μt)′Ht(θ)−1(yt−μt)
yields consistent estimates if the first two conditional moments are correctly specified (Jeantheau 1998). Asymptotic normality has been established only for BEKK (Comte-Lieberman 2003); the asymptotic theory for CCC/DCC relies on more informal arguments. Robust sandwich standard errors handle non-normality.
CCC-MGARCH Application: Korean Currency Crisis (Kim-Tsurumi 2000)
Kim and Tsurumi (2000) apply CCC-MGARCH to four daily Korean financial returns (Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) spot/futures and Won/Dollar spot/non-deliverable forward (NDF)) over October 1996 – April 1998. Marginal GARCH(1,1) estimates are integrated GARCH (IGARCH, α^i+β^i≈1) for all four series. Full-sample estimate: ρ^KF,KS=0.8597; pooled log-likelihood = −2100.77.
An unknown structural break date t∗ is estimated via Laplace-approximation Bayesian posterior: the log-posterior is proportional to split-sample log-likelihoods minus half the log-determinant of associated Hessians. Grid search over 5 July – 10 December 1997 yields a multivariate break mode at 20 October 1997, before the 8 November official Won devaluation. Derivative markets (futures: 11 August; NDF: 14 August 1997) broke earlier than spot markets (spot: 30 September; WS [Won/Dollar spot]: 22 October 1997), consistent with informed trading anticipating the crisis. See Kim-Tsurumi (2000).
Why It Matters
- Conditional correlations are central to portfolio construction (minimum-variance weights, risk parity), dynamic hedging ratios, and Value-at-Risk aggregation across assets.
- DCC-E offers a practical balance between flexibility and parsimony: O(N) correlation parameters vs. O(N2) for full BEKK, making it feasible for N up to 50–100.
- Time-varying correlations spike during crises (equity-bond correlation flips negative; within-equity correlations surge), making CCC empirically inadequate and DCC/GDC necessary.
Open Questions
- Marginalization properties of CCC/DCC: do they imply valid univariate GARCH for each component?
- Consistent estimation of large-N DCC (N>100): the O(N2) sample correlation Qˉ is noisy; regularization (shrinkage, factor structure) is active research.
- Asymptotic theory for CCC/DCC QML estimators: full proofs analogous to Comte-Lieberman (2003) for BEKK are not yet available.
- Identification of copula dynamics: time-varying copula parameters are hard to distinguish from marginal misspecification.
Related