Aloulou-Ellouze (2017) Does Fundamental Value Run Asset Price Formation Process?

option-pricingrisk-neutral-densitybehavioral-financeheterogeneous-agentsvarrational-expectationsswitching

Summary

Tests whether fundamental value or trader evaluations govern asset price formation using daily S&P TSX 60 options (Canada, Jan 2012–Dec 2013). Extracts risk-neutral densities (RNDs) nonparametrically via Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression on the implied-volatility surface (Aït-Sahalia-Lo 2000), constructing constant-maturity (30-day) option prices without Black-Scholes distributional bias. A bivariate vector autoregression (VAR(2)(2)) on forecast errors and a switching proxy (relative change in RND homogeneity) finds bidirectional Granger causality: past forecast errors drive strategy switching, and switching reduces future forecast errors — supporting the Keynes "beauty contest" view that heterogeneous trader evaluations, not fundamental deviations, govern price formation.

Key Claims

Concepts Introduced or Extended

Entities Mentioned

Quotes

"The price formation process appears governed by trader evaluations and strategy migration rather than deviation of prices from fundamental value."

My Take

The methodological contribution — nonparametric Nadaraya-Watson RND extraction to avoid Black-Scholes bias — is sound and well-motivated. The VAR results are clean (C(1,3)C_{(1,3)}, t=5.10t = -5.10 is strong). The main limitation is the switching proxy: relative change in RND homogeneity is an indirect and potentially noisy measure of actual strategy migration. The dataset is short (2 years, single index, Canada only), limiting generalizability. The "beauty contest" conclusion is intuitive but depends on accepting the switching proxy's validity as a measure of heterogeneous agent behavior.