Chib's handbook chapter is the canonical reference for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods in econometrics, covering the full toolkit from Markov chain theory through explicit algorithms for seventeen model classes. It unifies the Metropolis-Hastings (M-H) and Gibbs sampling algorithms under a common detailed-balance framework, catalogs data augmentation strategies across canonical Bayesian models, and surveys marginal likelihood computation methods including the Basic Marginal Likelihood Identity (Chib 1995), the Chib-Jeliazkov (2001) extension to M-H chains, and competing approaches (harmonic mean, Laplace, bridge sampling). Published as Chapter 57 of the Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 5, pp. 3569–3649.
Key Claims
Markov Chain Foundations
A chain has invariant distribution π iff it satisfies πP=π; sufficient condition is detailed balanceπ(x)P(x,y)=π(y)P(y,x), satisfied by construction in the M-H step (Section 3).
Key theorems (Tierney 1994): (1) law of large numbers (LLN) — irreducibility + invariance ⇒M−1∑h(θ(i))→Eπ[h] a.s.; (2) central limit theorem (CLT) — geometric ergodicity ⇒M(hˉ−Eπ[h])→N(0,σh2) where σh2 includes all autocorrelation lags.
Inefficiency factorτ^=Var(h^M)/(s2/M): ratio of numerical variance to the i.i.d. variance. Estimated by batch means (batch size m chosen so first-order autocorrelation of batch means <0.05).
Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm (Section 4)
Acceptance probability α(y,y′)=min{p(y′)q(y′,y)/[p(y)q(y,y′)],1} — requires only unnormalized p.
Candidate families: random walk q(y,y′)=q(y′−y); independence chain q(y,y′)=q(y′); M-H A-R (accept-reject embedded in M-H); tailored proposals from posterior mode and Hessian.
Multiple-block M-H (Section 4.4): group parameters into p blocks; update each block sequentially conditioning on the rest; each block-kernel satisfies local reversibility; combined kernel leaves π invariant via product-of-kernels principle.
Gibbs Sampler (Section 5)
Draw each block from its full conditional p(θk∣θ−k,y) — special case of M-H with α=1.
Connection to M-H: the Gibbs transition kernel is a specific M-H kernel; invariance follows from local reversibility of each full conditional step.
Collapsed/Rao-Blackwellised density estimation: p^(θ∗)=M−1∑KG(θ(g),θ∗) where KG is the Gibbs kernel (Ritter-Tanner 1992) — requires known normalizing constants for all full conditionals.
Block vs. marginalised sampling for random effects
17
MVP (multivariate probit)
Σ,β,{Zi}
Tailored independence M-H for Σ with Geweke-Hajivassiliou-Keane (GHK) evaluation
Predictive Density (Section 9)
Sample predictive density by composition: for each posterior draw θ(j), simulate yf(j)∼f(yf∣θ(j),y). For latent-data models, first draw zf(j)∼p(zf∣θ(j)) then yf(j)∼f(yf∣zf(j),θ(j)).
Marginal Likelihood (Section 10.2)
Basic Marginal Likelihood Identity (Chib 1995, eq. 36):
m(y∣M)=p(θ∗∣y,M)f(y∣θ∗)p(θ∗)
identity in θ∗; estimate the posterior ordinate p^(θ∗∣y) via a marginal/conditional decomposition requiring B−1 reduced Gibbs runs for a B-block sampler.
Chib-Jeliazkov (2001) extension for M-H chains (eq. 41):
p^(θ∗∣y)=J−1∑jα(θ∗,θ(j))M−1∑gα(θ(g),θ∗)q(θ(g),θ∗)
numerator from main run, denominator from a short run conditioned at θ∗.
Competing estimators (Section 10.2):
Harmonic mean (Newton-Raftery 1994): m^NR=[1/Lˉ]−1 — unstable, infinite variance
Gelfand-Dey (1994): truncated importance sampling version — stable but requires good truncation
Laplace: O(n−1) error — fast but large-sample only
Bridge sampling (Meng-Wong 1996): ratio of two normalizing constants — general but complex
Model-space algorithms (Section 10.3):
Carlin-Chib (1995) pseudo-prior: augment with pseudo-priors for inactive parameters; estimate Bayes factors as visit frequencies
Green (1995) reversible-jump MCMC (RJMCMC): dimension-matching bijections via Jacobian corrections; handles varying-dimension models
"MCMC methods which deal with the simulation of high dimensional probability distributions, have over the last decade gained enormous prominence, sparked intense research interest, and energized Bayesian statistics." (p. 3571)
"The second fact about marginal likelihoods, highlighted in a paper by Chib (1995), is that the marginal likelihood by virtue of being the normalizing constant of the posterior density can be expressed as m(y∣Mk)=f(y∣θk,Mk)p(θk∣Mk)/p(θk∣y,Mk). This expression is an identity in θk because the left hand side is free of θk." (p. 3629)
My Take
The best single reference for the practitioner who wants to understand how a specific model's Gibbs/M-H sampler is derived. The algorithm catalog (Section 8) is the chapter's primary value: each model's augmented state space, blocking structure, and full conditionals are derived from scratch in consistent notation. The model-choice section (Section 10) is the clearest written exposition of Chib (1995) and Chib-Jeliazkov (2001) available. As a review chapter it introduces no new theory, but the synthesis is authoritative.