Hedeker (2003) A Mixed-Effects Multinomial Logistic Regression Model

mixed-effectsrandom-effectslongitudinal-dataclustered-dataglmmmaximum-marginal-likelihoodquadraturenominal-datamultilevel-modelmissing-dataempirical-bayes

Summary

Hedeker (2003) describes a mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model for clustered or longitudinal data with nominal (unordered categorical) responses. The model adds subject-level random effects (RE) to the standard multinomial logit, with a flexible parameterization allowing any set of C-1 non-redundant category contrasts rather than requiring reference-cell coding. Estimation uses maximum marginal likelihood (MML) via Gauss-Hermite quadrature and Fisher scoring, implemented in the MIXNO software. A longitudinal study of housing status in homeless mentally ill adults (McKinney Homeless Research Project, MHRP; n=361, 4 time points, 3 categories) illustrates the Helmert contrast approach.

Key Claims

Concepts Introduced or Extended

Entities Mentioned

Quotes

"The use of Gibbs sampling and related methods provides an alternative way of handling the integration over the random-effect distribution. While the quadrature solution is relatively fast and computationally tractable for models with few random effects, Gibbs sampling is more advantageous for models with many random effects."

"The model makes an assumption that has been referred to as 'independence of irrelevant alternatives' in the econometric literature. This is because the effect of an explanatory variable comparing two categories is the same regardless of the total number of categories considered."

My Take

The flexible contrast-coding apparatus is the paper's most practically useful contribution — Helmert contrasts encode theoretical structure (off the streets vs. independent vs. community housing) directly into the model, avoiding post-hoc recoding. The MML-quadrature estimator is computationally efficient for small r but scales as QrQ^r; for modern high-dimensional RE problems, lme4 or Stan is preferred. The IIA assumption is the main theoretical limitation relative to Multinomial Probit, which allows correlated utilities via a full covariance matrix; but IIA is often reasonable when categories are substantively distinct. The paper is thin on random-slope models despite the framework allowing them.