Perron and Ng explain why Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root tests have severe size distortions when the error process has a root near the unit circle, and propose three modified M statistics (, , ) that cure the problem when paired with an autoregressive (AR) spectral density estimator. Local asymptotic analysis across three problematic error models — nearly-white-noise/nearly-integrated, nearly-twice-integrated, and nearly-seasonally-integrated — shows that kernel-based spectral density estimators cannot eliminate PP size distortions and in fact aggravate them, while the AR-based estimator keeps the M tests bounded in all three cases.
Phillips-Perron size distortions are estimator-driven. The PP statistics and diverge in the nearly-white-noise/nearly-integrated limit () regardless of the spectral density estimator. With kernel-based , divergence occurs at rate (faster than rate with ). Changing the kernel does not resolve the problem (Kim-Schmidt 1990 confirmed; no kernel can eliminate size distortions).
The modification factor creates bounded M statistics. The relation shows the M tests add a term that exactly offsets the explosive growth of in the nearly-integrated nearly-white-noise case, keeping bounded even when .
The AR spectral density estimator is essential. Formulated on first differences of : This decouples estimation from the (potentially inconsistent) . Kernel estimators built on ordinary least squares (OLS) residuals inherit 's inconsistency, causing divergence at rate (Theorem 3.3).
Local asymptotic results for three error models:
Power. dominates in power (consistent with Phillips-Ouliaris 1990 and Nabeya-Tanaka 1990 on asymptotic power ordering of vs. ). M tests match augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) power in positive AR case; exceed ADF power in negative MA case (where ADF size is also distorted). MSB power independent of when .
Empirical application. Real GDP (54:1–93:3): ARMA(1,1) (1.002, 0.25) — far from problematic space; all tests fail to reject unit root. Inflation (monthly PUNEW): ARMA(1,1) (0.98, 0.73) — large negative MA; kernel –1.91 (large), AR –0.10 (small). to spuriously rejects; M tests ( to , –0.24) correctly sustain the unit root null.
Implementation note. For trending data, de-trend in and (eqs. 2.6, 2.8) but include only a constant in autoregression (2.12): including a trend in (2.12) does not improve asymptotic accuracy and worsens finite-sample size. Standard asymptotic critical values (from Fuller 1976 for , ; from for ) are adequate.
"Kernel-based spectral density estimators tend to aggravate the size problem in the Phillips-Perron tests and yield no size improvement to the modified statistics."
"When appropriately implemented, the modified statistics have robust properties and are useful tests for a unit root. The statistics will also be useful in cointegration analysis where serial correlation in the noise function is often encountered."
The central insight — that the AR spectral density estimator, formulated on first differences, decouples estimation from the unreliable — is elegant and practical. The local asymptotic framework is the right tool to diagnose behavior precisely where standard asymptotics fail. The empirical inflation example is convincing: the PP tests' behavior is exactly as predicted by the theory (larger truncation lag faster divergence), while the M tests give stable, sensible answers. The caveat about forecasting (Section 8) is important but often ignored in applied work.