Schorfheide (2005) VAR Forecasting Under Misspecification

varforecastingmodel-misspecificationmodel-selectionloss-functionmulti-step

Summary

Develops an asymptotic theory for multi-step Vector AutoRegressive (VAR) forecasting when the model is potentially misspecified, published in Journal of Econometrics 128 (2005): 99–136. Introduces a local misspecification framework where the Data Generating Process (DGP) drifts toward a VAR(pp^*) at rate T1/2T^{-1/2}, defines two competing plug-in predictors (Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) and Loss Function Estimator (LFE)), and proposes a Prediction Criterion (PC) — a modification of Shibata's (1980) Final Prediction Error — that jointly selects lag order and estimator type. Monte Carlo results with 100,000 repetitions illustrate when each predictor dominates.

Key Claims

Concepts Introduced or Extended

Entities Mentioned

Quotes

"Under severe misspecification it is preferable to use the multi-step loss function also for parameter estimation."

My Take

A technically rigorous frequentist paper that formalizes an intuition (misspecification \to use direct/multi-step estimators) that practitioners had already acted on. The local misspecification framework is elegant but the T1/2T^{-1/2} drift rate is somewhat restrictive. The main practical insight — that PC guards against the wrong predictor choice ex ante — is useful but the selection criterion has substantial sampling noise (Tables 1–4 show the PC standard deviation is often comparable to the risk differential). Connections to Bayesian VAR are acknowledged but not developed; this is primarily a frequentist contribution.