Definition
A parametric survival model specifies the distribution of a time-to-event T through a fully parametric hazard (or, equivalently, survival) function and estimates covariate effects by maximum likelihood, accounting for censoring. In the proportional-hazards form the hazard is h(t∣x)=λ(t)exp(β′x) with a parametric baseline λ(t) (exponential, Weibull, or extreme-value), giving survival S(t∣x)=exp(−Λ(t)eβ′x), Λ(t)=∫0tλ(u)du. Aitkin-Clayton (1980) showed such models can be fit with ordinary Poisson generalized-linear-model software.
Key Ideas
- Baseline hazard families. Exponential: Λ(t)=t (constant hazard, memoryless). Weibull: Λ(t)=tα (monotone hazard, increasing/decreasing with the shape α). Extreme value (Gumbel): the distribution of logT under a Weibull T — a log-location-scale survival model.
- Proportional hazards, parametrically. Covariates act multiplicatively on the hazard, h=λ(t)eβ′x; eβj is a hazard ratio. Unlike Cox's semiparametric model, the baseline λ(t) is specified, so the full survival curve is estimated and extrapolation is possible.
- The Poisson trick. Writing the censored likelihood with event indicator wi and μi=Λ(ti)eβ′xi gives ∏iμiwie−μi times a parameter-free factor — the kernel of independent Poisson likelihoods with logμi=logΛ(ti)+β′xi. Survival ML is thus a log-linear Poisson regression with logΛ(t) as an offset.
- Fitting. Exponential needs a single Poisson fit (logt offset, coefficient 1); Weibull/extreme-value alternate a Poisson fit for β with an update of the shape α until convergence. Any GLM package suffices — the historical appeal of the method.
- Censoring. Right-censoring enters only through the indicator wi under the standard assumption that censoring is independent of the covariates, so the same machinery handles complex censored designs.
- Model selection. A simultaneous test procedure (Aitkin 1978) reduces a complex covariate cross-classification to a minimal adequate model while controlling the error rate over many nested comparisons.
- Bayesian nonparametric baseline (Kalbfleisch 1978). Instead of forcing an exponential/Weibull shape or leaving the baseline unspecified (Cox's partial likelihood), put a gamma-process prior on the cumulative baseline hazard Λ0 — a random-measure (Bayesian nonparametric) prior — and integrate it out. This gives a marginal posterior for β and an estimate of the baseline survival curve with honest uncertainty; Cox's partial likelihood is recovered as the diffuse-prior limit. The gamma process is the survival cousin of the Ferguson/Dirichlet-process priors, and the object it endows with a prior is exactly the cumulative hazard that Nelson-Aalen estimates frequentistically.
Why It Matters
- GLM tooling for survival. By recasting parametric survival as Poisson regression, the approach made proportional-hazards modeling accessible in general-purpose statistical software and is the direct ancestor of the piecewise-exponential / Poisson-regression survival methods used today.
- Interpretable, extrapolatable. A specified baseline hazard yields hazard ratios and absolute survival predictions beyond the observed follow-up — useful for actuarial and health-economic projection where Cox's baseline is left unspecified.
- Complements the counting-process view. It gives a parametric, regression-ready recipe sitting alongside the nonparametric counting-process / Nelson-Aalen estimator and its martingale asymptotics.
Open Questions
- Parametric misspecification. Exponential/Weibull impose strong shape assumptions on the baseline hazard; if wrong, hazard ratios are biased — the robustness cost relative to Cox's partial likelihood.
- Time-varying and non-proportional effects. Extending the Poisson formulation to time-dependent covariates or non-proportional hazards requires expanding the data into time intervals (the piecewise-exponential layout).
- Shape-parameter uncertainty. Standard errors for β that ignore estimation of the Weibull shape α can be optimistic.
Related